ADEPT Learning Object Metadata Model
Version History: Version 1
(01/09), (MS Excel file); Vocabularies
(01/24), (MS Word file); Version 2
(02/13); Version 2.5 (fragmented, varied on mailing lists);
Version: 3
- Excel Version (Full)
- HTML Version (Required)
Date: 15 May 2001
1. Introduction:
The Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype (ADEPT) is a
system that extends the Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) [1]. An initial step is
the establishment of an ADEPT Catalog describing resources in an ADEPT
Educational Collection.
The descriptions of resources, objects, items in the ADEPT Catalog employ the
ADEPT Learning Object Metadata Model (ADEPT LOMM). This model is used primarily
for the description of digital learning objects, though it can be used to
describe "any entity, digital or non-digital that may be used for learning,
education or training." [6] The model uses the approach to metadata content
standard representation recommended by the Federal Geographic Data Committee.
[5] However, the content (elements and their values) are based on the Metadata
Framework of the Digital Library for Earth Science Education (DLESE). [3] The
DLESE Metadata Framework uses the IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (IMS)
specification [7], based on the Learning Object Metadata (LOM) developed by the
Learning Technologies Standards Committee (LTSC) of the Institute of Electrical
& Electronics Engineers [6]. Modifications have been made to these
approaches and frameworks using the guiding principles to define the scope of
the conceptual model.
2. Scope or Guiding Principles for ADEPT LOMM Development:
The scope of
this metadata content standard for ADEPT is based on a definition of learning
objects. A learning object is defined as any resource or item that has been
created with or without explicitly stated educational objectives and purposes
and that has the potential to be described in terms of its spatial, temporal and
educational characterisitics, besides the usual bibliographic item or work
properties of form (resource type or genre), format (technical, computing
requirements properties), lifecycle (version, status, creator, publisher, date
of publication), classification (field of study, subject/topic) etc. Guiding
principles in the metadata determination for ADEPT learning objects are:
- Metadata and associated vocabulary development are expensive processes and
therefore, the model will borrow from existing metadata standards, schemes,
and vocabularies whenever possible. "Complex metadata needs are best met by
separate but functionally focused metadata schemes, relatively orthogonal and
independently maintained by communities of expertise and practice." [4]
- The conceptual data model must accommodate the development of additional
metadata in a modular and extensible fashion since we envisage that metadata
needs may change during the lifecycle of a learning object.
- Despite the name and focus of the framework upon educational objects, we
should be able to describe or co-opt the description of other resources and
objects for search and retrieval via the ADEPT Catalog, thereby enabling their
functional use (by both humans and software) in learning environments.
- Descriptions must be mapped to relevant ADL search buckets [8] and new
search buckets identified, if appropriate.
- It must be possible to semi-automatically maintain crosswalks and
automatically generate the metadata files for objects in standards such as
Dublin Core, IMS and demonstrate true multi-organizational collaboration.
3. ADEPT Collections (Collection Boundaries):
Metadata usually describes
the properties and content of objects in a collection. The ADEPT definition of a
learning object is fairly comprehensive; therefore, some assumptions and
limitations are made about our metadata and collections. These are used to draw
collection boundaries:
- Physical Format: ADEPT will not attempt to collect or describe
non-digital data.
- Educational Purpose and Nature: Resources that have been created
for educational purposes are the primary collection objects, resources, items
and works. These include a variety of learning materals such as lecture
presentations, syllabi, computer-based exercises & activities, field
guides, etc. However, non-educationally focused (NEF) resources can also be
described using the metadata model [9]. NEF resources are items that have been
created without an educational objective, but which can nevertheless be used
for teaching and learning purposes. Just as it is important for Digital
Libraries (DLs) to be able to describe non-digital formats, it is essential to
recognize that learning spaces in DLs can be created virtually and through
software tools that combine and present resources for teaching/learning tasks.
Such experimentation with virtual construction is only possible if the ADEPT
Catalog includes a diversity of resources. For educational purposes, elements
besides form, format, subject/topic, field of study, and copyright are:
status, copyright, educational objective expressed in scientific reasoning
learning outcome terms or teaching/learning processes (not content outcomes),
type of interactivity, level of interactivity, duration, intended use, and
learning context.
- Subject/Topic/Idea: Objects and resources in ADEPT Collections
cover concepts in Physical and Human Geography (primary collection areas of
focus are: fluvial processes & processes of human diffusion). An ADEPT
goal is to improve the geographic thinking and scientific reasoning skills of
users of the collection materials. Therefore, properties/attributes of items
in terms of their discipline (field of study), geography (subject), spatial
and temporal coverage are key aspects for description and identification of
relationships and DL manipulation tools that enhance the acquisition of
scientific reasoning skills. Geographic processes in their spatial and
temporal scales and thematic systems contexts (see the Conceptual Model of
Earth System processes diagram [12]) must be specifically described in
great detail along with higher order (scientific reasoning, not content level)
educational characteristics and uses.
- Form/Type of Resource: The focus is on geospatial digital data
forms & formats such as:
- Maps (specify and limit formats; for example for fluvial processes
select from ADL DRGs, DEMs, DOQQs
- Measurements and observations (real time data): for example,
comma-delimited ascii *.txt, *.xls
- Satellite imagery (select from ADL: AVHRR, Landsat, SPOT, NAPP)
- Software, Code, Tools that are web-accessible or deployable for
computer/simulation modelling in geography.
ADEPT proposes to describe a
complex information object (complex digital resource) known as
computer/simulation models. Components of simulation models are:
- Theory or Hypothesis (form: text, article, image, experiment, case
study)
- Observations and Measurements (form: data; formats: xls, txt)
- Computer Hardware (form: none; description provided using metadata in
technical category of elements in ADEPT LOMM)
- Computer Software (form: software, code; formats: executables; descriptions
can specify computing platforms, installation remarks))
- Animation (form: animations; formats: jpg, gif, avi)
- Visualization (form: visualizations; formats: avi, jpg)
- Report, Review, Annotation, Experiment, Article (formats: html,
txt, pdf)
4. Tools and Functionality of Metadata:
The Climate Data Library at Columbia University demonstrates the tools developed to manipulate selected climate datasets for educational purposes. It also provides a good example of the kind of metadata that is needed to build software functionality.
- The Basic
Design;
-
An Overview of Streamflow Data (rather Fluvial Processes Data)
Software functionality similar to what's demonstrated at the Climate Data Library and at numerous other statistical/mathematical JAVA applet and scientific simulation sites is where the iterative process of ADEPT metadata model development begins to strive towards. [12]
5. Definitions:
1. FGDC Approach to Metadata Content Standard Development and
Representation
The FGDC's Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
(CSDGM) "establishes the names of data elements and compound
elements to be used, the definitions of the data elements and compound
elements, and information about the values that are to be provided for the data
elements." [5]
Compound Elements
A compound element is a group of data elements
and other compound elements. All compound elements are described by data
elements, either directly or through intermediate compound elements. Compound
elements represent higher-level concepts that cannot be represented by
individual data elements.
Short Names
Short names consisting of eight
alphabetic characters or less are included to assist in implementation of the
standard.
Data Elements
A data element is a logically primitive item of
data. The entry for a data element includes the name of the data element, the
definition of the data element, a description of the values that can be assigned
to the data element, and a short name for the data element. The form for the
definition of the data elements is:
Data element name -- definition.
Type:
Domain:
Short Name:
The information about the values for the data elements include a description
of the type of the value, and a description of the domain of
the valid values. The type of the data element describes the kind of
value to be provided. The choices are "integer" for integer numbers, "real" for
real numbers, "text" for ASCII characters, "date" for day of the year, and
"time" for time of the day.
The domain describes valid values that can be assigned to
the data element. The domain may specify a list of valid values, references to
lists of valid values, or restrictions on the range of values that can be
assigned to a data element.
The domain also may note that the domain is free from restrictions, and any
values that can be represented by the "type" of the data element can be
assigned. These unrestricted domains are represented by the use of the word
"free" followed by the type of the data element (that is, free text, free date,
free real, free time, free integer). Some domains can be partly, but not
completely, specified.
Optionality
The standard categorizes elements as being mandatory, or
optional as follows:
- Mandatory elements must be provided.
- Mandatory-if-applicable elements must be provided if the data set exhibits
the defined characteristic
- Optional elements are provided at the discretion of the metadata producer.
The optionality of a section or compound element always takes
precedence over the elements that it contains.
For comparison with other metadata standards, mandatory elements are referred
to as "core" elements.
The ADEPT LOMM uses compound elements, data elements, data type, domain, and
optionality. It modifies the optionality and data type sections as explained
later under the section titled ADEPT LOMM Additions & Modifications.
2. DLESE/IMS/IEEE LOM Metadata Frameworks
The IEEE LOM is the basis of
the IMS and DLESE metadata frameworks. In this standard or framework the
metadata for a resource, object, or item can be described using nine categories
of compound and data elements. The nine categories (groups of elements) are:
a. General: information that describes the (learning) object as a whole
b. Lifecycle: features related to the history, current state, and those who
have affected the development of this (learning) object
c. Meta-metadata:
information about the metadata itself
d. Technical: technical requirements
and characteristics
e. Educational: educational and pedagogic
characteristics
f. Rights: intellectual property rights and conditions of
use
g. Relations: relationship between this and other targeted (learning)
objects
h. Annotation: comments on educational use
i. Classification:
use of classification systems to describe the (learning) object
5. ADEPT LOMM Additions & Modifications:
ADEPT LOMM takes the nine
categories of the IEEE/IMS/DLESE metadata and adds three other categories of
elements:
j. Geo-spatial: information about the spatial coverage
k.
Object-in-space: properties/contents of description, outside the Earth and from
an Earth perspective
l. Temporal: characteristics/description of temporal
coverge
Plans are to add an extensive set of elements to enable comprehensive
description of the properties of a digital information object called
computational/simulation models. [2].
It organizes the mandatory elements from
all categories to form a required "core" set of elements that must be present for
all resources, objects, items in the ADEPT Catalog.
Other modifications include:
- Optionality of a category takes precedence over compound or data elements.
That is, if the category itself is optional, then elements under it cannot
become a part of the required "core."
- Extending optionality with conditional. That is, the elements under
conditional are only described when they meet a certain condition.
- Type of Data is extended with codelist, enumeration, list, appropriate
standard, and name of controlled vocabulary, classification scheme, or
thesaurus.
- Two pedagogical elements, educational objective and function/use are
adapted to enable the description of higher cognitive order processes related
to scientific reasoning and type of media used.
- ADEPT LOMM elements are mapped to ADL generic query search buckets. An
educational bucket can be proposed, if necessary, to enable searching using
the ADL/ADEPT system/search engine.
References:
[1] Alexandria Digital Library. URL: http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/
[2] Crosier, Scott. http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~scott/metadata/index.html
[3] DLESE Metadata. http://www.dlese.org/Metadata
[4]
EU-NSF Metadata Working Group. Metadata for Digital Libraries. URL: http://www.iei.pi.cnr.it/DELOS/NSF/metadata.html
[5] FGDC CSDGM. URL: http://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/csdgm/organization.html
[6] IEEE LOM Base Scheme v. 3.5. URL: http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/scheme.html
[7] IMS Meta-Data Information Model, V1.1. URL: http://www.imsproject.org/metadata/mdinfov1p1.html
[8] Search Buckets in ADL. URL:
http://www.sbg.ac.at/geo/eogeo/authors/frew/web/search-buckets.html
[9] Ip,
Albert et al. Managing Online Resources for Teaching and Learning.
http://ausweb.scu.edu/aw2k/papers/ip/paper.html
[10] Milstead, Jessica and
Susan Feldman. Metadata: Cataloging by Any Other Name. URL:
http://www.onlineinc.com/onlinemag/OL1999/milstead1.html
[11] Coleman,
Anita. >Defining Educational Collections, Version 2. URL: http://alexandria.sdc.ucsb.edu/~acoleman/defcollv2.html
[12] Coleman, Anita. Use of Simulation
Models in Teaching, Version 3. URL: http://alexandria.sdc.ucsb.edu/~acoleman/amodels3.html
Notes on Resources for Collection Development
Select from:
Maps: USGS Digital Data
Faq; USGS Mapping
Information: National Mapping Program Standards; StreamFlow Map of the United States;
Water Science
Gallery - Questions: Shapefile? SDTS? An easier way may be to decide on
map layers (use the US National Atlas May
Layers - for example, is it useful to get Streams and WaterBodies
Information? or for example USGS Surface water data site for
North Carolina)
Datasets, Measurements, data tables: SAST Upper Mississippi and
Lower Missouri site)
Satellite imagery: Landsat; National Aerial
Photography Program which are useful, needed, available from ADL?)
Required (Mandatory Core) Elements proposed for ADEPT LOMM
HTML file
Full ADEPT LOMM
MS Excel
file
Created by Anita S. Coleman
First created 04/27; shared 05/08/01